<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>everything flows &#187; social networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lukerodgers.ca/tag/social-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca</link>
	<description>a celestial emporium of benevolent knowledge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:35:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Schwarzenegger uses Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2009/03/schwarzenegger-uses-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2009/03/schwarzenegger-uses-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luke Rodgers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fabulous and random things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictable things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web and tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerodgers.ca/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arnold's fan base on Facebook unleashes a torrent of &#60;sarcasm&#62;insightful and witty commentary&#60;/sarcasm&#62;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that Arnold Schwarzenegger (of whom I am a &#8220;fan&#8221; on Facebook, and in real life&#8212;at least, of his movies and his environmentalism) has finally started taking advantage of the Facebook fan base he has. Or, at least, someone operating in his name has begun doing so. Unlike <a href="http://twitter.com/mayormiller">@mayormiller</a>, I don&#8217;t imagine Ahnold does his own web updating.</p>
<p><span id="more-554"></span>Though not much of interest has taken place so far, other than a link to a Facebook group on budget reform that was followed by a few dozen comments, at least half of which were from some jackass writing &#8220;STFU &lt;insert name here&gt;&#8221; to everyone who commented, I&#8217;ll be following along to see where and how things go.</p>
<p>As you can see from the image, the commentary is a predictable mixture of insults, half-brained criticisms, movie quotes, and spam. Go Web 2.0!!</p>
<div id="attachment_556" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 121px"><a href="http://www.lukerodgers.ca/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/ahnold.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-556" title="ahnold" src="http://www.lukerodgers.ca/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/ahnold-111x300.jpg" alt="ahnold" width="111" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">click to view full image</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2009/03/schwarzenegger-uses-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As the web gets smarter, will our anonymity evaporate?</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2009/01/the-web-gets-smarter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2009/01/the-web-gets-smarter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luke Rodgers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[things about which I am ambivalent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web and tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerodgers.ca/?p=401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most exciting things going on in webland today, I think, is the myriad of technologies, user experiences, and computer-to-computer interactions that typically pass under the monikers of &#8220;Web 3.0&#8221; or &#8220;the semantic web.&#8221; There isn&#8217;t a lot (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2009/01/the-web-gets-smarter/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most exciting things going on in webland today, I think, is the myriad of technologies, user experiences, and computer-to-computer interactions that typically pass under the monikers of &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_3.0">Web 3.0</a>&#8221; or &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Web">the semantic web</a>.&#8221; There isn&#8217;t a lot of general agreement on what precisely these terms mean (though I think the latter is more concrete), but what many people envision as the future of the web is an online environment in which data, text, and various forms of information and media are structured in ways that are machine-readable (if not machine-interpretable), leading to all sorts of new possibilities for interoperability between websites, new forms of user-agent interaction, and generally a web experience that is less characterized by &#8220;dumb&#8221; websites.</p>
<p>All of this, in addition to the manifest benefts, of course probably would present new opportunities for abuse, invasive marketing techniques, and threats to users&#8217; privacy.</p>
<p>A glimpse of this last concern was provided recently by a paper from some Google researchers (&#8220;<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2009/01/what-your-social-network-can-r.html">Could your social networks spill your secrets</a>?&#8221;) that details how data from two different social networking sites (e.g. LinkedIn and Myspace) could be linked together to reveal the single person behind two different public profiles, despite the profiles being relatively anonymous and not directly linked. From the NewScientist article:</p>
<blockquote><p>That approach is dubbed &#8220;merging social graphs&#8221; by the researchers. In fact, it has already been used to identify some users of the <abbr title="Digital Versatile Disc">DVD</abbr> rental site Netflix, from a supposedly anonymised dataset released by the company. The identities were revealed by combining the Netflix data with user activity on movie database site IMDb.</p></blockquote>
<p>December 2009: As an addendum to this article, I direct your attention to <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2009/09/20/project_gaydar_an_mit_experiment_raises_new_questions_about_online_privacy/?page=full">&#8220;project gaydar&#8221;</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2009/01/the-web-gets-smarter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

