<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>everything flows &#187; journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lukerodgers.ca/tag/journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca</link>
	<description>a celestial emporium of benevolent knowledge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:35:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The future of journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2009/01/the-future-of-journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2009/01/the-future-of-journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luke Rodgers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web and tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerodgers.ca/?p=416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From one of my favourite e-newsletters, J-Source, comes a provocative article by Alan Bass, assistant prof at Thompson Rivers University School of Journalism, that takes journalists themselves to task for failing to preserve the vitality of journalism and for failing (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2009/01/the-future-of-journalism/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From one of my favourite e-newsletters, <a href="http://www.j-source.ca/english_new/page.php?p=26">J-Source</a>, comes a provocative article by Alan Bass, assistant prof at Thompson Rivers University School of Journalism, that takes journalists themselves to task for failing to preserve the vitality of journalism and for failing to make the case for the relevance of journalism vis-a-vis the infotainment that constitutes the majority of &#8220;media.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://jsource.ca/english_new/detail.php?id=3225&amp;utm_campaign=Now%20on%20J-Source%3A%20How%20journalism%20will%20survive%3B%20Twitter%20tips%20for%20journos%3B%20Blanket%20coverage%20of%20Obama&amp;utm_content=lukeasrodgers@gmail.com&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_source=VerticalResponse&amp;utm_term=What%27s%20wrong%20with%20journalism%3F%20Look%20in%20the%20mirror">What&#8217;s wrong with journalism? Look in the mirror</a> is worth reading for anyone interested in the challenges that faced by major news outlets&#8211;particularly those challenges posed by the new forms of media emerging on the web. Though I think Bass places too much blame on journalists themselves (and simultaneously assumes they have more power to reform &#8220;the press&#8221; than they do), such calls for serious self-reflection are an essential part of efforts to change large, public institutions like the media. If change can&#8217;t (at least partially) come from within, it won&#8217;t happen.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2009/01/the-future-of-journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

