<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for everything flows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lukerodgers.ca/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca</link>
	<description>a celestial emporium of benevolent knowledge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:17:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The magic of the free market explained by Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2008/07/the-magic-of-the-free-market-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerodgers.ca/?p=89#comment-627</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m impressed. You&#039;ve really rsiaed the bar with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m impressed. You&#8217;ve really rsiaed the bar with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Philosophical Chuck Norris Facts by Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2010/11/some-philosophical-chuck-norris-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 23:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerodgers.ca/?p=737#comment-626</guid>
		<description>Chuck Norris roundhoused a monad.  

The monad broke into pieces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck Norris roundhoused a monad.  </p>
<p>The monad broke into pieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why do all thesauri seem to suck? by Ros</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2010/02/why-do-all-thesauri-seem-to-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Ros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerodgers.ca/?p=677#comment-624</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d think a thesaurus would have something to offer in terms of expanding vocabulary, but nope:  it&#039;s just the same collection of platitudes anyone proficient in English ought to be familiarized with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d think a thesaurus would have something to offer in terms of expanding vocabulary, but nope:  it&#8217;s just the same collection of platitudes anyone proficient in English ought to be familiarized with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Philosophical Chuck Norris Facts by BBC.CNN WORLD NEWS</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2010/11/some-philosophical-chuck-norris-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>BBC.CNN WORLD NEWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerodgers.ca/?p=737#comment-622</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know the actual reason.
But its very tough to know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know the actual reason.<br />
But its very tough to know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Philosophical Chuck Norris Facts by philonny (philosophy + funny) &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2010/11/some-philosophical-chuck-norris-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>philonny (philosophy + funny) &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 01:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerodgers.ca/?p=737#comment-621</guid>
		<description>[...] in, &#8220;you&#8217;re full of philonny!&#8221; http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2010/11/some-philosophical-chuck-norris-facts/ http://www.philosophicallexicon.com/#LEXICON Add links in comments if you got &#8216;em;) Like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in, &#8220;you&#8217;re full of philonny!&#8221; <a href="http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2010/11/some-philosophical-chuck-norris-facts/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2010/11/some-philosophical-chuck-norris-facts/</a> <a href="http://www.philosophicallexicon.com/#LEXICON" rel="nofollow">http://www.philosophicallexicon.com/#LEXICON</a> Add links in comments if you got &#8216;em;) Like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Philosophical Chuck Norris Facts by Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2010/11/some-philosophical-chuck-norris-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerodgers.ca/?p=737#comment-619</guid>
		<description>Chuck Norris carved a round square copula when he roundhouse kicked a tree.

Knowledge is a belief held by Chuck Norris.

The prudent man is Chuck Norris.

Chuck Norris has free will.

Descartes can be sure of Chuck Norris&#039; existence.

Objects have inherent properties because Chuck Norris holds them in his mind.

Chuck Norris kept dividing by one half and reached zero.

When Chuck Norris says &quot;Snow is White&quot; it is a completely separate proposition in and of itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck Norris carved a round square copula when he roundhouse kicked a tree.</p>
<p>Knowledge is a belief held by Chuck Norris.</p>
<p>The prudent man is Chuck Norris.</p>
<p>Chuck Norris has free will.</p>
<p>Descartes can be sure of Chuck Norris&#8217; existence.</p>
<p>Objects have inherent properties because Chuck Norris holds them in his mind.</p>
<p>Chuck Norris kept dividing by one half and reached zero.</p>
<p>When Chuck Norris says &#8220;Snow is White&#8221; it is a completely separate proposition in and of itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Philosophical Chuck Norris Facts by Allan Olley</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2010/11/some-philosophical-chuck-norris-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Olley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerodgers.ca/?p=737#comment-618</guid>
		<description>Chuck Norris is something nothing greater than can be imagined.

People who believe the finite can not prove the infinite have never been round house kicked by Chuck Norris.

Fitch&#039;s Paradox of Knowability can be resolved by reference to the principle that P implies that Chuck Norris knows that P and has so far allowed P to continue to exist.

When Bentham said that: &quot;Nature has put man under the governance of two sovereign masters: pain and pleasure.&quot; Bentham was actually using his nicknames for Chuck Norris&#039;s right and left fists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck Norris is something nothing greater than can be imagined.</p>
<p>People who believe the finite can not prove the infinite have never been round house kicked by Chuck Norris.</p>
<p>Fitch&#8217;s Paradox of Knowability can be resolved by reference to the principle that P implies that Chuck Norris knows that P and has so far allowed P to continue to exist.</p>
<p>When Bentham said that: &#8220;Nature has put man under the governance of two sovereign masters: pain and pleasure.&#8221; Bentham was actually using his nicknames for Chuck Norris&#8217;s right and left fists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Philosophical Chuck Norris Facts by Micah</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2010/11/some-philosophical-chuck-norris-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerodgers.ca/?p=737#comment-617</guid>
		<description>Aristotle&#039;s ethical theory does not apply to Chuck Norris: for Chuck Norris, virtue is ALWAYS found at the extreme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aristotle&#8217;s ethical theory does not apply to Chuck Norris: for Chuck Norris, virtue is ALWAYS found at the extreme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Philosophical Chuck Norris Facts by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2010/11/some-philosophical-chuck-norris-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerodgers.ca/?p=737#comment-616</guid>
		<description>Chuck Norris has reasons Reason doesn&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck Norris has reasons Reason doesn&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some Philosophical Chuck Norris Facts by Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.lukerodgers.ca/2010/11/some-philosophical-chuck-norris-facts/comment-page-1/#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 22:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukerodgers.ca/?p=737#comment-615</guid>
		<description>The physical world imitates the world of the forms but the world of the forms imitates Chuck Norris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The physical world imitates the world of the forms but the world of the forms imitates Chuck Norris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

