Archive for the “philosophy” category

Mis-applications of Gaia theory

by Luke Rodgers on May 31, 2011

I often encounter a sort of frustrating combination of Gaia theory plus bad philosophy of language, which goes something like this:
Earth is not sick, earth has been around for billions of years, and underwent many catastrophes before us, and will (…)

Read the rest of this entry »

Neat, plausible, and wrong

by Luke Rodgers on May 4, 2011

One of my favourite quotations is from H.L. Mencken:
There is always an easy solution to every human problem–neat, plausible, and wrong.
Tom Flanagan amply demonstrates the sort of reasoning at which this barb was aimed in a recent op-ed for The Globe (…)

Read the rest of this entry »

Hegel gets colloquial

by Luke Rodgers on March 24, 2011

From page 1174-5, Volume 2 of the Aesthetics, translated by T.M. Knox.
“If a book does not please me, I can lay it aside, just as I can pass by pictures or statues that are not to my taste, and in (…)

Read the rest of this entry »

A Heidegger Poem??

by Luke Rodgers on November 27, 2010

who knew equipmentality was so lyrical

Some Philosophical Chuck Norris Facts

by Luke Rodgers on November 25, 2010

(The original)
Chuck Norris can imagine a chiliagon.
Chuck Norris has intellectual intuition.
Chuck Norris threatened Alexandre Kojeve into conceding that history wasn’t over until Chuck Norris said it was.
After watching one episode of Walker: Texas Ranger, Nietzsche changed his concept of “the (…)

Read the rest of this entry »

Epic Castoriadis run-on sentence

by Luke Rodgers on October 19, 2010

Currently reading Castoriadis’ The Imaginary Institution of Society. The man likes his run-on sentences, as evidenced below. Semi-colons do little to mitigate the sense of being overwhelmed by the piling-up of explications.
The image is therefore a symbol here — but (…)

Read the rest of this entry »

Marxist or Marxian

by Luke Rodgers on May 1, 2010

Is there a difference?

Me on my buddy’s blog

by Luke Rodgers on April 29, 2010

On the naivete of brain science