Archive for the “annoying things” category

Bug in ckeditor version 3.6.1 revision 7072

by Luke Rodgers on July 15, 2011

Using ckeditor and jquery adapter, and with a textarea that is initialized as a ckeditor instance more than once, once with content, once without, you may encounter a bug in Firefox, p is null.
Go to line 126, change
p.setHtml(”);
to
if (p) { (…)

Read the rest of this entry »

To LibraryThing widget users:

by Luke Rodgers on February 15, 2009

Librarything.com went down, leading to issues for users of my LibraryThing widget.

Improve your pagination’s usability

by Luke Rodgers on February 15, 2009

In short: pad your a elements liberally

IE6 CSS hacks with Wordpress.com

by Luke Rodgers on February 12, 2009

A trick for tweaking the CSS of your Wordpress.com blog for IE6.

Thank god Rogers is continuing to innovate

by Luke Rodgers on January 22, 2009

Apparently for Rogers, innovation means “making a few TV shows and movie previews available for free, and claiming that our Internet is the fastest in Canada without providing any support for the claim, and raising a bunch of our prices.” (…)

Read the rest of this entry »

Scam ads on Facebook

by Luke Rodgers on January 21, 2009

Perhaps I’m the only one to whom this would be unexpected, but I was surprised to notice blatant scam ads on Facebook today. Maybe they’re not a recent addition but I just noticed them today for the first time. I (…)

Read the rest of this entry »

The #1 reason not to use Joomla

by Luke Rodgers on November 15, 2008

The most annoying issue with Joomla!, despite the admirable efforts of many people involved with the project, is its tendancy to output crappy HTML. Even still, at least one of the default themes uses tables for layout, and last time (…)

Read the rest of this entry »

Fido.ca’s usability sin

by Luke Rodgers on September 19, 2008

There are few things that universally qualify as web design FAILs. The esteemed Jakob Nielsen has a list of Top-10 Web Design Mistakes from 1999 which, in web years, is a long time. Long enough that you think people would (…)

Read the rest of this entry »